EU CRYPTO REGISTER · COMPARISON · LAST VERIFIED
Bitvavo vs Bitpanda: MiCA licence status compared
This page compares Bitvavo and Bitpanda against the ESMA Register of MiCA-Authorised Crypto-Asset Service Providers. In short: Bitvavo is authorised in Netherlands (since 14 July 2025) with 3 services; Bitpanda is authorised in Austria (since 9 April 2025) with 7 services. All data is sourced from primary public records.
One-line summary
Both Bitvavo (authorised in Netherlands, 14 July 2025) and Bitpanda (authorised in Austria, 9 April 2025) appear in the ESMA Register of MiCA-Authorised CASPs. Source: ESMA Register of CASPs, retrieved 14 May 2026.
Side-by-side: Bitvavo vs Bitpanda under MiCA
Every row is sourced from the ESMA register (Article 109 MiCA), GLEIF, and CoinGecko. Retrieved 14 May 2026.
| Question | Bitvavo | Bitpanda |
|---|---|---|
| In the ESMA MiCA register? | Yes | Yes |
| EU legal entity | Bitvavo B.V. | Bitpanda GmbH |
| Home Member State | Netherlands | Austria |
| Authorisation date | ||
| Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) | - | - |
| Number of authorised services | 3 | 7 |
| Custody authorised | Yes | Yes |
| Trading platform authorised | Yes | No |
| Year founded | - | - |
| CoinGecko trust score | - | - |
What is the key difference between Bitvavo and Bitpanda under MiCA?
The key difference is regulatory home: Bitvavo is supervised primarily by the National Competent Authority of Netherlands, while Bitpanda is supervised by the National Competent Authority of Austria. Under MiCA Article 65, both can passport their authorised services across the entire EEA, but day-to-day supervision, the investor compensation framework, and the regulator that handles complaints differ. The Bitvavo entity Bitvavo B.V. reports 3 authorised services; the Bitpanda entity Bitpanda GmbH reports 7.
Which services do Bitvavo and Bitpanda offer under MiCA?
MiCA Article 3(1)(16) defines ten distinct crypto-asset services. The authorisation an exchange holds is service-specific. A "Yes" below means the entity is authorised for that service in its home Member State and may passport that service across the EEA.
| Service | Bitvavo | Bitpanda |
|---|---|---|
| Custody | Yes | Yes |
| Trading platform | Yes | No |
| Exchange for funds | No | Yes |
| Exchange for crypto | No | Yes |
| Order execution | No | Yes |
| Placing | No | Yes |
| Order R&T | No | Yes |
| Advice | No | No |
| Portfolio mgmt | No | No |
| Transfer services | Yes | Yes |
FAQ: Bitvavo vs Bitpanda
Is Bitvavo licensed under MiCA in the EU?
Yes. Bitvavo appears in the ESMA Register of MiCA-Authorised CASPs through Bitvavo B.V., authorised in Netherlands on 14 July 2025.
Is Bitpanda licensed under MiCA in the EU?
Yes. Bitpanda appears in the ESMA Register of MiCA-Authorised CASPs through Bitpanda GmbH, authorised in Austria on 9 April 2025.
Which is safer to use in the EU, Bitvavo or Bitpanda?
Regulatory protection is not the same as commercial safety, but MiCA authorisation is the strongest signal an EU resident has of supervised operations. Authorised CASPs are subject to client-asset ring-fencing (Article 70), prudential capital, complaint handling, and transparency rules. Choose based on a combination of licence status, service breadth, and own due diligence.
Can Bitvavo and Bitpanda both passport into all EEA countries?
An EU member state authorisation enables passporting across the EEA under MiCA Article 65, subject to a notification process. An exchange not in the register cannot passport. Always confirm which legal entity is your counterparty before depositing.
Where does the data on this page come from?
All licence data is taken from the ESMA Register of Crypto-Asset Service Providers (retrieved 14 May 2026); legal-entity details come from the GLEIF LEI database; market data comes from CoinGecko. Each source is cited inline and linked at the bottom of this page.
Sources cited on this page
Comparisons on this page are derived from the public ESMA register and GLEIF entries. The Crypto Register has no commercial relationship with either provider. Last verified .