EU REGISTER · COMPARE · UPDATED 18 July 2026

Compare crypto providers by what is verifiable.

Every row on this page is built from the official EU registers, not from affiliate rankings. Filter 293 MiCA-authorised providers and 15 tracked exchanges without an EU licence by licensing status, home Member State and the services they are actually authorised to provide, then put up to four side by side.

We do not score, rank or accept payment for placement. The default order puts authorised providers first, then sorts alphabetically. Sources for this page are listed at the bottom; prefer a guided read instead? Start with the safe EU exchanges explainer or answer four questions.

Which providers are actually authorised?

Filters

How does this comparison work?

Built from the registers

Exchange rows mirror the ESMA register of MiCA-authorised crypto-asset service providers, re-validated weekly against primary regulator sources under a two-source rule. Derivatives and card rows follow the same discipline on their own registers.

No scores, no paid placement

This page never shows a rating and never sells a position. Where a metric appears, it is a register fact you can re-check yourself: an authorisation date, a service list, a passporting notification. The methodology explains every field.

Promotions are verified and flagged

A promotion appears only after we verify it is live on the provider's own site, and it always links to the terms with an inducement disclosure. Promotions never affect ordering; unverified ones simply do not render.

Sources

ESMA Register of Crypto-Asset Service Providers, the canonical source for every licensing status, authorisation date, service list and passporting notification shown above.
GLEIF Legal Entity Identifier database, used to verify each authorised entity's legal identity; the LEI in every register record links to its GLEIF entry.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA), which defines the ten crypto-asset service types used as the denominator in the services metric.
Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II), the authorisation framework behind the derivatives-venue statuses; per-venue register sources are listed on each profile.

Compare crypto providers by what is verifiable.

Which providers are actually authorised?

21bitcoin

360 Treasury Systems AG

Acheron

AK JENSEN NORWAY AS

Alaric Securities

ALPHACAP

AlphaRoute

Altarius Asset Management Limited

Altlift s.r.o.

Amdax B.V.

AMINA EU

AnCeKa Vermögensbetreuungs Aktiengesellschaft

APLO

Ari10

AS LHV Pank

AvianLabs Netherlands B.V.

B2C2

Baader Bank AG

Backpack EU

Baden-Württembergische Wertpapierbörse GmbH

Banca Sella

Bank Frick AG

Bankhaus Scheich Wertpapierspezialist AG

Banking Circle

BANQUE DELUBAC

BARE BITCOIN AS

BBVA

Belayer

Bequant

Bison Bank

Bit2Me

BITCOIN STORE

Bitcoin Suisse (Europe) AG

BITCOINMAT

bitFlyer EUROPE

BitGo Europe GmbH

Bitmymoney B.V.

Bitonic

Bitpanda

Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH

BITSTACK

BitStaete B.V.

Bitstamp

Bittimaatti

Bitvavo

BlockBen

Blockchain.com

Blockrise

BLOX B.V.

BLUE EMI

Boerse Stuttgart Digital Custody GmbH

Bpifrance Investissement

Bridge

BTC Direct

Bullish Europe GmbH

BV & P Vermögen AG

BVNK

Bybit

CACEIS BANK

CAIXABANK

Calamatta Cuschieri Investment Services Limited

capital.com

CECABANK

Celsion Bank AG

Change, Change Invest, getchange.com, ChangePro, changeinvest.com, AgenaTrader, agenatrader.com, TradersYard, tradersyard.com

CheckSig

CIRCLE

ClearBank Europe B.V.

Clearstream

Coinbase

Coinfinity

CoinFlip

Coingate

COINHOUSE

CoinJar

COINMATE a.s.

Coinmerce

Coinmotion